FLOKI’s TokenFi: The Bitget Exchange Controversy

The cryptocurrency landscape is no stranger to dramatic controversies, and the recent clash between Bitget Exchange and FLOKI concerning the TokenFi listing is a glaring example of this. In this blog post, we’ll explore the events surrounding TokenFi’s listing, the subsequent allegations of market manipulation, and how FLOKI has responded to Bitget’s actions, all while expressing concerns about the exchange’s financial stability.

The TokenFi Listing Controversy

In late October, Bitget Exchange made headlines with its decision to delist TokenFi (TOKEN) due to what it described as “intense price fluctuations” and allegations of market manipulation by the TOKENFI project team. This announcement not only left TOKEN holders anxious but also cast doubt on Bitget’s role in the unfolding controversy.

The Bitget Exchange Controversy: FLOKI's Take on "TokenFi"

Understanding the Roles of Bitget, FLOKI and TokenFi

Bitget, FLOKI and TokenFi are distinct entities within the cryptocurrency and blockchain space, each with unique roles and interactions. Let’s clarify their relationships:

Bitget Exchange:

Bitget is a cryptocurrency exchange platform that provides a marketplace for users to trade a diverse range of cryptocurrencies, including FLOKI and TokenFi. Cryptocurrency exchanges like Bitget serve as intermediaries, facilitating the buying and selling of digital assets.

FLOKI (Shiba Inu):

FLOKI, an abbreviation for Shiba Inu, is a cryptocurrency project with its own token. Inspired by the popularity of the meme token Shiba Inu, FLOKI has carved its own niche within the cryptocurrency ecosystem. FLOKI tokens are tradable on various cryptocurrency exchanges, including Bitget.


TokenFi (TOKEN) is a separate cryptocurrency project that has issued its own token. In the context of the controversy discussed in this blog post, TokenFi is the focal point of discussion. It was listed on Bitget, leading to the contentious situation and allegations of market manipulation between TokenFi’s project team and Bitget Exchange.

To summarize their relationships:

  • FLOKI is a distinct cryptocurrency project with its token, tradable on various cryptocurrency exchanges, including Bitget.
  • TokenFi is another cryptocurrency project with its token and became the central subject of dispute when it was listed on Bitget.
  • Bitget, as a cryptocurrency exchange, played a pivotal role in the controversy by initially listing TokenFi and subsequently delisting it based on allegations of market manipulation.
    Bitget’s Official Announcement

Bitget Exchange, in its official announcement, cited significant price volatility after TOKENFI’s listing. They suspected that the TOKENFI project team deliberately manipulated market liquidity by holding tokens worth less than $2,000 in the DEX pool. This gave rise to concerns about potential market manipulation.

Additionally, Bitget identified various issues with TokenFi, including a lack of transparency regarding the token’s economic model and undisclosed release cycles. In the interest of user protection, Bitget opted to delist TOKENFI and initiated a buyback plan based on the token’s highest closing price during its five days of trading on the exchange.

FLOKI’s Perspective

FLOKI’s perspective on the matter sharply contrasts with Bitget’s. According to FLOKI, they had initially required all partner exchanges to wait for seven days after a token’s release before listing it. However, Bitget, being the smallest exchange in their network, purportedly proceeded to list TOKENFI without adhering to this waiting period. FLOKI also alleged that Bitget listed the token 12 minutes ahead of the official trading start, essentially accusing Bitget of engaging in short selling without holding actual tokens.

Market Expectations and Bitget’s Predicament

Bitget had initially expected to enable withdrawals 24 hours after the start of trading, anticipating a drop in TOKENFI’s price during this period. This would have allowed Bitget to repurchase tokens at a lower cost. However, TOKENFI’s price exceeded Bitget’s expectations, resulting in significant losses. Consequently, Bitget decided to suspend withdrawals to buy more time.

OTC Negotiations Fail

As the situation escalated, FLOKI reached out to Bitget to assist in resolving the problem. Bitget revealed that they required a substantial quantity of TOKEN to meet withdrawal requests and address the issue. This quantity amounted to nearly 10% of the total token supply, valued at approximately $20 million at the time of writing. OTC negotiations were initiated, but Bitget proposed a purchase price at a 90% discount, an offer that FLOKI found unacceptable.

TokenFi's founder, FLOKI's Accusations and Concerns on Bitget

FLOKI’s Accusations and Concerns

FLOKI levied several accusations against Bitget, including premature token listing, significant trading volumes without evidence of covering user positions, and a reluctance to take responsibility for their actions. They challenged Bitget to provide verifiable wallet links to substantiate their TOKEN holdings and transaction history.

Furthermore, FLOKI expressed concerns regarding Bitget’s overall financial solvency. The actions taken by Bitget during the TOKENFI controversy raised questions about the exchange’s risk management practices and operational procedures. FLOKI cautioned users that trading or holding FLOKI on Bitget carried significant risks, particularly in light of the uncertainty surrounding the exchange’s financial stability.


The dispute between Bitget Exchange and FLOKI over the TOKENFI listing has shone a light on the complexities and challenges within the cryptocurrency world. Allegations of market manipulation and solvency concerns have left many users uncertain about the safety of their investments. Ultimately, the truth remains subject to user evaluation, serving as a reminder of the importance of due diligence when participating in the cryptocurrency market.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *